<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 860 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436834</link>
    <description>HC ruled on tax declaration discrepancy under Section 129, where a transporter incorrectly declared tax on invoice and E-way bill. After acknowledging the error and rectifying tax payment in monthly returns, the court directed authorities to verify documentation and potentially reduce penalty. The interim order emphasized corrective actions and proper tax compliance in interstate goods transportation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 860 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436834</link>
      <description>HC ruled on tax declaration discrepancy under Section 129, where a transporter incorrectly declared tax on invoice and E-way bill. After acknowledging the error and rectifying tax payment in monthly returns, the court directed authorities to verify documentation and potentially reduce penalty. The interim order emphasized corrective actions and proper tax compliance in interstate goods transportation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>