<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 848 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty of Rs.1,50,000 imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that as the assessee did not maintain books of account, the penalty for non-furnishing of an audit report was not justified, referencing precedents where penalty under section 271B was not applicable when books of account were not maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 848 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty of Rs.1,50,000 imposed under section 271B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that as the assessee did not maintain books of account, the penalty for non-furnishing of an audit report was not justified, referencing precedents where penalty under section 271B was not applicable when books of account were not maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>