https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436812 Non-disclosure of a petitioner's identity or connection with a respondent did not, on these facts, by itself justify threshold rejection where the writ raised allegations of public importance. The undisclosed source of a relied-on document and the availability of alternative remedies were also treated as no automatic bar to maintainability in serious public probity matters. However, earlier Division Bench decisions on the same gold smuggling allegations barred re-agitation of the same public cause through a fresh writ petition. The Court also declined to direct further investigation or monitor ongoing Customs and Enforcement Directorate inquiries, finding no exceptional circumstances or reliable material showing that the existing investigation was unfair, incomplete, or unlawful. en-us Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 23:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436812 Non-disclosure of a petitioner's identity or connection with a respondent did not, on these facts, by itself justify threshold rejection where the writ raised allegations of public importance. The undisclosed source of a relied-on document and the availability of alternative remedies were also treated as no automatic bar to maintainability in serious public probity matters. However, earlier Division Bench decisions on the same gold smuggling allegations barred re-agitation of the same public cause through a fresh writ petition. The Court also declined to direct further investigation or monitor ongoing Customs and Enforcement Directorate inquiries, finding no exceptional circumstances or reliable material showing that the existing investigation was unfair, incomplete, or unlawful. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436812