https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436805 Contempt for breach of an undertaking requires proof of wilful and conscious disobedience beyond reasonable doubt; where the evidence shows initial compliance and the later dispute concerns possession, inspection, or alleged structural issues, contempt is not made out. On the insolvency side, revival of Section 9 proceedings is not justified where the admitted debt forming their basis has already been paid, even if other claims or disputes remain between the parties. Those residual disputes are left to be resolved before the competent forum, rather than through revival of the insolvency process. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 23:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436805 Contempt for breach of an undertaking requires proof of wilful and conscious disobedience beyond reasonable doubt; where the evidence shows initial compliance and the later dispute concerns possession, inspection, or alleged structural issues, contempt is not made out. On the insolvency side, revival of Section 9 proceedings is not justified where the admitted debt forming their basis has already been paid, even if other claims or disputes remain between the parties. Those residual disputes are left to be resolved before the competent forum, rather than through revival of the insolvency process. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436805