https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307543 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Technical Bid Evaluation Summary and Financial Bid Opening Summary in a tender process. The petitioner, a Class-A registered Public Works Department Contractor, sought a fresh evaluation due to rejection based on a missing license. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons in decisions affecting rights and found no illegality in the authority's actions. It held that unless tender conditions required time for submission, authorities were not obligated to grant it, especially considering the petitioner's delay. The rejection reasons were communicated, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs awarded. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:14:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307543 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Technical Bid Evaluation Summary and Financial Bid Opening Summary in a tender process. The petitioner, a Class-A registered Public Works Department Contractor, sought a fresh evaluation due to rejection based on a missing license. The court emphasized the importance of providing reasons in decisions affecting rights and found no illegality in the authority's actions. It held that unless tender conditions required time for submission, authorities were not obligated to grant it, especially considering the petitioner's delay. The rejection reasons were communicated, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307543