<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 24 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32495</link>
    <description>The Authority rejected the application without considering the merits of the case due to pending similar questions in appeals filed by the entity that merged with the applicant. The Authority emphasized that the appeals concerned the applicant, who had taken over the rights and responsibilities of the merging entity, and therefore the application was rejected under section 245R(2) without delving into the specifics of the issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 24 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32495</link>
      <description>The Authority rejected the application without considering the merits of the case due to pending similar questions in appeals filed by the entity that merged with the applicant. The Authority emphasized that the appeals concerned the applicant, who had taken over the rights and responsibilities of the merging entity, and therefore the application was rejected under section 245R(2) without delving into the specifics of the issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>