<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 826 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307538</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the judgment, ruling in favor of the appellant in a motor vehicle accident compensation claim. It was determined that the deceased and injured were not representatives of the owner of goods in the vehicle but were traveling as gratuitous passengers. The insurance company was found not liable for compensation as they failed to prove any breach of insurance policy terms. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:40:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 826 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307538</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the judgment, ruling in favor of the appellant in a motor vehicle accident compensation claim. It was determined that the deceased and injured were not representatives of the owner of goods in the vehicle but were traveling as gratuitous passengers. The insurance company was found not liable for compensation as they failed to prove any breach of insurance policy terms. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>