https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307537 The court held that the trial court's decision to address the limitation issue along with other issues was justified as evidence was required. Jurisdictional issues raised during interim relief applications can be decided along with other issues if evidence is necessary. The power to frame and re-frame issues lies with the court, not parties. The precedent regarding limitation issues touching on jurisdiction was specific to its facts. The civil revision application was rejected, and the rule was discharged with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:38:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307537 The court held that the trial court's decision to address the limitation issue along with other issues was justified as evidence was required. Jurisdictional issues raised during interim relief applications can be decided along with other issues if evidence is necessary. The power to frame and re-frame issues lies with the court, not parties. The precedent regarding limitation issues touching on jurisdiction was specific to its facts. The civil revision application was rejected, and the rule was discharged with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307537