https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307536 An objection that a suit is barred by limitation is not, by itself, a jurisdictional objection for Section 9A CPC. Section 9A applies only when jurisdiction to entertain the suit is specifically challenged at the stage of interim relief, and not where the issue is a limitation plea requiring evidence on disputed facts. The trial court therefore correctly proceeded under Order 14 Rule 2(2) CPC and refused to frame limitation as a preliminary issue. The challenge to that order failed and the revision was rejected. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:35:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307536 An objection that a suit is barred by limitation is not, by itself, a jurisdictional objection for Section 9A CPC. Section 9A applies only when jurisdiction to entertain the suit is specifically challenged at the stage of interim relief, and not where the issue is a limitation plea requiring evidence on disputed facts. The trial court therefore correctly proceeded under Order 14 Rule 2(2) CPC and refused to frame limitation as a preliminary issue. The challenge to that order failed and the revision was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307536