https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307535 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, determining that the legal owner of the shares was not acting as an express trustee. It was held that the shares purchased by a partnership firm belonged to the individual partners after the dissolution of the partnership. The court also concluded that the statute of limitation did not bar the plaintiffs from claiming ownership of the shares in this case. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 1944 00:00:00 +0630 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:32:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307535 The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, determining that the legal owner of the shares was not acting as an express trustee. It was held that the shares purchased by a partnership firm belonged to the individual partners after the dissolution of the partnership. The court also concluded that the statute of limitation did not bar the plaintiffs from claiming ownership of the shares in this case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Dec 1944 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307535