https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307532 Section 9-A in Maharashtra permits a jurisdictional objection raised at the hearing of an interim-relief application to be tried as a preliminary issue, overriding the ordinary rule under Order 14, Rule 2. Where the plaintiff consented before the trial court to first decide jurisdiction and evidence was recorded on that basis, the plaintiff could not later object in appeal that the issue was incapable of preliminary determination. The trial court was right to decide jurisdiction as a preliminary issue, and the appellate court erred in holding otherwise. en-us Wed, 05 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:19:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307532 Section 9-A in Maharashtra permits a jurisdictional objection raised at the hearing of an interim-relief application to be tried as a preliminary issue, overriding the ordinary rule under Order 14, Rule 2. Where the plaintiff consented before the trial court to first decide jurisdiction and evidence was recorded on that basis, the plaintiff could not later object in appeal that the issue was incapable of preliminary determination. The trial court was right to decide jurisdiction as a preliminary issue, and the appellate court erred in holding otherwise. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307532