<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 812 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the license fee paid to Celltick Technologies Limited is not taxable in India under the India-Israel tax treaty. It also ruled that no TDS was required on the remittance to Celltick Israel due to retrospective applicability of the second proviso to section 40(a)(i), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals for all assessment years involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:02:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 812 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the license fee paid to Celltick Technologies Limited is not taxable in India under the India-Israel tax treaty. It also ruled that no TDS was required on the remittance to Celltick Israel due to retrospective applicability of the second proviso to section 40(a)(i), dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals for all assessment years involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>