<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 809 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. It was held that the assessee, a listed company, had adequately proven the genuineness of the share application money received, shifting the burden of proof to the AO, who failed to provide substantial evidence to refute the assessee&#039;s documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:02:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 809 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order deleting the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. It was held that the assessee, a listed company, had adequately proven the genuineness of the share application money received, shifting the burden of proof to the AO, who failed to provide substantial evidence to refute the assessee&#039;s documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>