<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 790 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436764</link>
    <description>The court directed the Respondents to treat the imported goods as Eucalyptus Oil instead of Eucalyptol, based on a laboratory report confirming the nature of the goods. This decision was influenced by the higher duty payable on Eucalyptus Oil, ensuring no prejudice to the Revenue. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:01:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 790 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436764</link>
      <description>The court directed the Respondents to treat the imported goods as Eucalyptus Oil instead of Eucalyptol, based on a laboratory report confirming the nature of the goods. This decision was influenced by the higher duty payable on Eucalyptus Oil, ensuring no prejudice to the Revenue. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of in favor of the Petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>