<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 781 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436755</link>
    <description>A Section 9 insolvency petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was rejected because the operational debt was found to be subject to a pre-existing dispute. The Tribunal treated the creditor&#039;s reference to the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council, together with the surrounding facts and invoice-based claim, as showing that the liability had already become a live controversy before the insolvency filing. It distinguished cases where a bare MSME reference, without supporting facts, would not by itself establish dispute. The rejection of the petition was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 781 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436755</link>
      <description>A Section 9 insolvency petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was rejected because the operational debt was found to be subject to a pre-existing dispute. The Tribunal treated the creditor&#039;s reference to the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council, together with the surrounding facts and invoice-based claim, as showing that the liability had already become a live controversy before the insolvency filing. It distinguished cases where a bare MSME reference, without supporting facts, would not by itself establish dispute. The rejection of the petition was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>