https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436750 Limitation for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was held to run from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order, not from the date of later knowledge or receipt of communication. Section 61 provides a special limitation framework of thirty days with a further condonable period of fifteen days, and that regime prevails over the broader approach under the Companies Act, 2013. Prior authorities did not establish that limitation begins only on knowledge of the order, and the record did not support the appellant's claimed date of first receipt. As the delay was not shown to fall within the condonable period, condonation was refused. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436750 Limitation for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was held to run from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order, not from the date of later knowledge or receipt of communication. Section 61 provides a special limitation framework of thirty days with a further condonable period of fifteen days, and that regime prevails over the broader approach under the Companies Act, 2013. Prior authorities did not establish that limitation begins only on knowledge of the order, and the record did not support the appellant's claimed date of first receipt. As the delay was not shown to fall within the condonable period, condonation was refused. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436750