https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436750 The Tribunal dismissed the delay condonation application and rejected the appeal as it was filed beyond the permissible period, even when calculated from the date of receipt of the email on 04.01.2023. The appellant's argument regarding the order being received on 08.01.2023 was not substantiated with material evidence, leading to the rejection of the appeal against the Adjudicating Authority's order directing the reversal of a transaction in favor of the Corporate Debtor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436750 The Tribunal dismissed the delay condonation application and rejected the appeal as it was filed beyond the permissible period, even when calculated from the date of receipt of the email on 04.01.2023. The appellant's argument regarding the order being received on 08.01.2023 was not substantiated with material evidence, leading to the rejection of the appeal against the Adjudicating Authority's order directing the reversal of a transaction in favor of the Corporate Debtor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 18 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436750