<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 761 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436735</link>
    <description>Where a tax statute expressly makes penalty and interest follow objective conditions, the authority has no discretion to waive the civil consequence once those conditions are met. Under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, failure to pay assessed or reassessed tax above the statutory threshold triggered mandatory penalty under Section 45(6) and interest under Section 47(4A). Bona fide belief, absence of mens rea, or later payment of the differential tax did not negate liability, because the provisions were treated as plain and unambiguous. Earlier authorities requiring mens rea were distinguished on materially different wording. The High Court&#039;s deletion of the levy was set aside and the tax liability was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 761 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436735</link>
      <description>Where a tax statute expressly makes penalty and interest follow objective conditions, the authority has no discretion to waive the civil consequence once those conditions are met. Under the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, failure to pay assessed or reassessed tax above the statutory threshold triggered mandatory penalty under Section 45(6) and interest under Section 47(4A). Bona fide belief, absence of mens rea, or later payment of the differential tax did not negate liability, because the provisions were treated as plain and unambiguous. Earlier authorities requiring mens rea were distinguished on materially different wording. The High Court&#039;s deletion of the levy was set aside and the tax liability was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>