<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 1061 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307521</link>
    <description>A writ petition under Article 226 is not fit for discretionary relief where the petitioner suppresses material facts directly bearing on the cause of action. Full candour and clean hands are required in writ jurisdiction, and concealment of the account-freezing order and the underlying investigation showed lack of bona fides. The petition was therefore dismissed as not entertainable for suppression of material facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 21:28:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 1061 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307521</link>
      <description>A writ petition under Article 226 is not fit for discretionary relief where the petitioner suppresses material facts directly bearing on the cause of action. Full candour and clean hands are required in writ jurisdiction, and concealment of the account-freezing order and the underlying investigation showed lack of bona fides. The petition was therefore dismissed as not entertainable for suppression of material facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>