https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307526 At the stage of an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, the Court must confine itself to the plaint averments and cannot reject a plaint on allegations that an agreement to sell, power of attorney or sale deeds are forged and fabricated where genuineness is a disputed question of fact requiring evidence. The Supreme Court held that such issues must be tried on merits, not decided at the threshold. The rejection of the plaint was therefore set aside and the suit restored for decision in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Apr 2023 21:28:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307526 At the stage of an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, the Court must confine itself to the plaint averments and cannot reject a plaint on allegations that an agreement to sell, power of attorney or sale deeds are forged and fabricated where genuineness is a disputed question of fact requiring evidence. The Supreme Court held that such issues must be tried on merits, not decided at the threshold. The rejection of the plaint was therefore set aside and the suit restored for decision in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307526