<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 286 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32474</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, a non-resident company providing technical services for oil exploration. The court held that the services rendered qualified as technical services under sections 44D and 115A of the Income-tax Act, subjecting the company to a 15% tax rate instead of the 10% rate under section 44BB. The decision overturned the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, clarifying the tax treatment for non-resident companies in similar scenarios involving services for oil exploration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 286 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32474</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, a non-resident company providing technical services for oil exploration. The court held that the services rendered qualified as technical services under sections 44D and 115A of the Income-tax Act, subjecting the company to a 15% tax rate instead of the 10% rate under section 44BB. The decision overturned the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order, clarifying the tax treatment for non-resident companies in similar scenarios involving services for oil exploration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>