<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 750 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436724</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to set aside the penalty imposed under Section 273(2)(aa) of the Income Tax Act due to a clerical error in the initial notice. The Court directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty, stating that the mistake in the notice was of a clerical nature and did not invalidate the penalty. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, and the pending application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 750 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436724</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to set aside the penalty imposed under Section 273(2)(aa) of the Income Tax Act due to a clerical error in the initial notice. The Court directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty, stating that the mistake in the notice was of a clerical nature and did not invalidate the penalty. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose, and the pending application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>