<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 736 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436710</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, annulling the order of the CIT(A) and cancelling the late fee levied under section 234E of the Act. The decision was based on the retrospective effect of section 200A(1)(c) and the absence of enabling provisions for charging late fees before 01.06.2015. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was in line with previous judgments and principles of statutory interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 736 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436710</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, annulling the order of the CIT(A) and cancelling the late fee levied under section 234E of the Act. The decision was based on the retrospective effect of section 200A(1)(c) and the absence of enabling provisions for charging late fees before 01.06.2015. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was in line with previous judgments and principles of statutory interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>