<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32472</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that certain charges like supervision, fumigation, and weigh bridge receipts are not eligible for exemption under section 10(29) of the Income Tax Act for a government-owned corporation, despite the corporation&#039;s argument that all its incomes directly derived from warehousing activities should qualify for exemption. The Tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized the specific nature of income sources and their connection to warehousing activities. Additionally, the judgment highlighted the mandatory requirement for government-owned corporations to obtain clearance from the Committee of Disputes before filing an appeal, underscoring the importance of intra-governmental dispute resolution mechanisms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 166 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32472</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that certain charges like supervision, fumigation, and weigh bridge receipts are not eligible for exemption under section 10(29) of the Income Tax Act for a government-owned corporation, despite the corporation&#039;s argument that all its incomes directly derived from warehousing activities should qualify for exemption. The Tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized the specific nature of income sources and their connection to warehousing activities. Additionally, the judgment highlighted the mandatory requirement for government-owned corporations to obtain clearance from the Committee of Disputes before filing an appeal, underscoring the importance of intra-governmental dispute resolution mechanisms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>