<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 730 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It affirmed that the assessee was not obligated to deduct TDS on transmission charges to OPTCL. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of consistency and lack of new evidence or appeal against the prior ruling, concluding that Section 40(a)(ia) did not apply in this scenario.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 730 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. It affirmed that the assessee was not obligated to deduct TDS on transmission charges to OPTCL. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of consistency and lack of new evidence or appeal against the prior ruling, concluding that Section 40(a)(ia) did not apply in this scenario.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>