<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1408 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307507</link>
    <description>Stock write-off was allowed where the assessee showed nearing-expiry vaccine inventory and discontinued toothbrush stock through internal approvals and board records, and the Revenue did not rebut the documentary evidence. Advertisement and publicity was held deductible because it promoted the assessee&#039;s own products in India; incidental benefit to a foreign associated enterprise did not convert it into impermissible brand-building. Education cess was held not deductible as a tax on income. Questions on disallowance for vaccine purchases from a Belgian supplier and on product development expenses were remanded for fresh adjudication because the earlier authorities had not properly addressed the factual and DTAA-related objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 21:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1408 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307507</link>
      <description>Stock write-off was allowed where the assessee showed nearing-expiry vaccine inventory and discontinued toothbrush stock through internal approvals and board records, and the Revenue did not rebut the documentary evidence. Advertisement and publicity was held deductible because it promoted the assessee&#039;s own products in India; incidental benefit to a foreign associated enterprise did not convert it into impermissible brand-building. Education cess was held not deductible as a tax on income. Questions on disallowance for vaccine purchases from a Belgian supplier and on product development expenses were remanded for fresh adjudication because the earlier authorities had not properly addressed the factual and DTAA-related objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>