<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1649 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing the significance of the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) in determining Arm&#039;s Length Pricing (ALP) for international transactions and its impact on the appellant&#039;s transfer pricing assessments. The admission of additional evidence related to the APA led to the remittance of all issues for fresh consideration, highlighting the crucial role of the APA in resolving transfer pricing disputes for the relevant assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 21:28:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1649 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing the significance of the Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) in determining Arm&#039;s Length Pricing (ALP) for international transactions and its impact on the appellant&#039;s transfer pricing assessments. The admission of additional evidence related to the APA led to the remittance of all issues for fresh consideration, highlighting the crucial role of the APA in resolving transfer pricing disputes for the relevant assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>