<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 704 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436678</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC disposed petition challenging provisional attachment of properties and bank accounts for wrongful Input Tax Credit availment. The court declined to examine the competent authority&#039;s power to issue second provisional attachment order after one year&#039;s expiry, noting that show cause notice under section 74 had commenced adjudication proceedings. The court directed authorities to complete time-bound adjudication proceedings, stating that once concluded, parties&#039; rights would crystallize and determine the provisional attachment order&#039;s fate. Petitioner&#039;s GSTIN registration cancellation and input tax credit blocking were not specifically addressed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 704 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436678</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC disposed petition challenging provisional attachment of properties and bank accounts for wrongful Input Tax Credit availment. The court declined to examine the competent authority&#039;s power to issue second provisional attachment order after one year&#039;s expiry, noting that show cause notice under section 74 had commenced adjudication proceedings. The court directed authorities to complete time-bound adjudication proceedings, stating that once concluded, parties&#039; rights would crystallize and determine the provisional attachment order&#039;s fate. Petitioner&#039;s GSTIN registration cancellation and input tax credit blocking were not specifically addressed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>