<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 701 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436675</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax order but granted exceptional relief. Despite the belated appeal filing beyond the 120-day limitation period, the court allowed the petitioner one week to approach the appellate authority, subject to meeting procedural requirements. The decision considered the petitioner&#039;s status as a small trader and provided procedural flexibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=711017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 701 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436675</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax order but granted exceptional relief. Despite the belated appeal filing beyond the 120-day limitation period, the court allowed the petitioner one week to approach the appellate authority, subject to meeting procedural requirements. The decision considered the petitioner&#039;s status as a small trader and provided procedural flexibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>