<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 259 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32461</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the amount received under the RBI&#039;s Optional Early Retirement Scheme qualifies for exemption under section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act. Relief under section 89(1) is granted for sums exceeding Rs. 5,00,000. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of Rule 2BA, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements and implied terms to fulfill legislative intent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 259 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32461</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the amount received under the RBI&#039;s Optional Early Retirement Scheme qualifies for exemption under section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act. Relief under section 89(1) is granted for sums exceeding Rs. 5,00,000. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of Rule 2BA, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements and implied terms to fulfill legislative intent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>