<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 671 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436645</link>
    <description>Post-clearance reassessment of a bill of entry is outside the proper officer&#039;s jurisdiction because goods cleared for home consumption cease to be imported and dutiable goods. A Deputy Commissioner therefore cannot reopen or review the original assessment after clearance, rendering such reassessment invalid. Refund under the Customs Act cannot be granted on the basis of an invalid reassessment; the importer must first obtain modification of the original bill of entry through appellate proceedings. Refund claims founded on the reassessment consequently fail. The principles concerning valuation and unjust enrichment do not arise where the claims are rejected on the jurisdictional defect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 671 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436645</link>
      <description>Post-clearance reassessment of a bill of entry is outside the proper officer&#039;s jurisdiction because goods cleared for home consumption cease to be imported and dutiable goods. A Deputy Commissioner therefore cannot reopen or review the original assessment after clearance, rendering such reassessment invalid. Refund under the Customs Act cannot be granted on the basis of an invalid reassessment; the importer must first obtain modification of the original bill of entry through appellate proceedings. Refund claims founded on the reassessment consequently fail. The principles concerning valuation and unjust enrichment do not arise where the claims are rejected on the jurisdictional defect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>