<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 670 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436644</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of Customs duties and interest, upheld liability for confiscation of imported goods under specific sections of the Customs Act, and imposed penalties on the involved parties. The penalties under Section 114AA were set aside for the appellant and another individual due to lack of evidence, while the rest of the impugned order was upheld. The appeals were partly allowed in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 670 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436644</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of Customs duties and interest, upheld liability for confiscation of imported goods under specific sections of the Customs Act, and imposed penalties on the involved parties. The penalties under Section 114AA were set aside for the appellant and another individual due to lack of evidence, while the rest of the impugned order was upheld. The appeals were partly allowed in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>