https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436633 In W.P.(C) No. 23950 of 2017, the High Court quashed the notice and letter issued by the Department regarding non-payment of service tax after a lapse of 10 years, citing dismissal of the Department's appeal by the Supreme Court and a favorable judgment from the CESTAT. The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, staying further proceedings. Similarly, in W.P.(C) No. 21602 of 2017, the High Court quashed a notice and subsequent letters for non-payment of service tax, following the same rationale. Both petitions were allowed without costs. en-us Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436633 In W.P.(C) No. 23950 of 2017, the High Court quashed the notice and letter issued by the Department regarding non-payment of service tax after a lapse of 10 years, citing dismissal of the Department's appeal by the Supreme Court and a favorable judgment from the CESTAT. The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, staying further proceedings. Similarly, in W.P.(C) No. 21602 of 2017, the High Court quashed a notice and subsequent letters for non-payment of service tax, following the same rationale. Both petitions were allowed without costs. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436633