<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 655 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436629</link>
    <description>The Bench held that freight and handling charges, when separately shown in invoices, should not be included in the assessable value of excisable goods for Central Excise Duty purposes. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, setting aside the duty demand on these charges as unsustainable. The judgment relied on legal precedents and emphasized that such charges are specific costs for services, distinct from the goods&#039; value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 655 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436629</link>
      <description>The Bench held that freight and handling charges, when separately shown in invoices, should not be included in the assessable value of excisable goods for Central Excise Duty purposes. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, setting aside the duty demand on these charges as unsustainable. The judgment relied on legal precedents and emphasized that such charges are specific costs for services, distinct from the goods&#039; value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>