<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 647 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436621</link>
    <description>A summoning order in criminal proceedings must show application of mind and a reasoned satisfaction that the essential ingredients of the alleged offences are prima facie made out. Where the order contains only a bare assertion of prima facie case, and the complaint and protest petition suppress material facts about earlier proceedings and the status of the property dispute, continuation of prosecution is impermissible. The note further states that, where the complainant society itself had resolved that the earlier secretary lacked authority to prosecute and did not wish to continue, the cognizance and summons order was unsustainable and the criminal proceedings were liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 647 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436621</link>
      <description>A summoning order in criminal proceedings must show application of mind and a reasoned satisfaction that the essential ingredients of the alleged offences are prima facie made out. Where the order contains only a bare assertion of prima facie case, and the complaint and protest petition suppress material facts about earlier proceedings and the status of the property dispute, continuation of prosecution is impermissible. The note further states that, where the complainant society itself had resolved that the earlier secretary lacked authority to prosecute and did not wish to continue, the cognizance and summons order was unsustainable and the criminal proceedings were liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>