<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 850 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307480</link>
    <description>Credible eyewitness testimony can sustain a murder conviction when it is materially corroborated by medical and forensic evidence. The Supreme Court noted that a consistent account of the assault, supported by the site plan, photographs, post-mortem findings and forensic linkage between the recovered firearm and empty cartridges, outweighed the defence version and alleged discrepancies. Blackened injuries indicating close-range firing, prompt lodging of the FIR, and the admitted presence of one accused with a loaded gun further strengthened the prosecution case. Minor investigative inconsistencies and peripheral omissions were held insufficient to create reasonable doubt, and the convictions and sentences were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:20:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 850 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307480</link>
      <description>Credible eyewitness testimony can sustain a murder conviction when it is materially corroborated by medical and forensic evidence. The Supreme Court noted that a consistent account of the assault, supported by the site plan, photographs, post-mortem findings and forensic linkage between the recovered firearm and empty cartridges, outweighed the defence version and alleged discrepancies. Blackened injuries indicating close-range firing, prompt lodging of the FIR, and the admitted presence of one accused with a loaded gun further strengthened the prosecution case. Minor investigative inconsistencies and peripheral omissions were held insufficient to create reasonable doubt, and the convictions and sentences were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>