<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 645 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436619</link>
    <description>The appellate authority&#039;s rejection of the appeal solely because the mandatory pre-deposit was made through the Electronic Credit Ledger was unsustainable. A GST Policy Wing circular clarified that such pre-deposit may be made through the Electronic Credit Ledger, so the procedural objection no longer survived and the deposit had to be accepted. The matter was remitted to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication of the appeal on merits after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 645 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436619</link>
      <description>The appellate authority&#039;s rejection of the appeal solely because the mandatory pre-deposit was made through the Electronic Credit Ledger was unsustainable. A GST Policy Wing circular clarified that such pre-deposit may be made through the Electronic Credit Ledger, so the procedural objection no longer survived and the deposit had to be accepted. The matter was remitted to the appellate authority for fresh adjudication of the appeal on merits after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>