<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 629 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the revision order under section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to drop the proposed additions after considering the assessee&#039;s reply was valid. The Tribunal emphasized that the absence of detailed discussion on proposed additions in the final assessment order did not render it erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the revision order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 629 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the revision order under section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to drop the proposed additions after considering the assessee&#039;s reply was valid. The Tribunal emphasized that the absence of detailed discussion on proposed additions in the final assessment order did not render it erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the revision order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>