<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CIT(E) must verify AO&#039;s decision u/s 263 before declaring it erroneous regarding Section 24(a) deduction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69260</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - once we have found that AO has discharged the duty of investigator (on the issue of deduction claimed u/s 24(a) of the Act which included amenities charges), then before CIT(E) holds the view of AO as erroneous, it was imperative on the part of CIT(E) to have made necessary enquiries or verification and should have arrived at a conclusion that the view of AO was unsustainable in law. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:06:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:06:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CIT(E) must verify AO&#039;s decision u/s 263 before declaring it erroneous regarding Section 24(a) deduction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69260</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - once we have found that AO has discharged the duty of investigator (on the issue of deduction claimed u/s 24(a) of the Act which included amenities charges), then before CIT(E) holds the view of AO as erroneous, it was imperative on the part of CIT(E) to have made necessary enquiries or verification and should have arrived at a conclusion that the view of AO was unsustainable in law. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:06:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>