https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436579 The HC followed the binding Supreme Court ruling in connected excise exemption litigation and held that the impugned notifications withdrawing or reducing the duty exemption were not barred by promissory estoppel. The notifications were treated as clarificatory measures issued in public interest and in the interest of revenue, so the challenge to their validity could not succeed. As no surviving issue remained on the legality of the notifications or any entitlement to continuance of full exemption, the writ petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:05:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436579 The HC followed the binding Supreme Court ruling in connected excise exemption litigation and held that the impugned notifications withdrawing or reducing the duty exemption were not barred by promissory estoppel. The notifications were treated as clarificatory measures issued in public interest and in the interest of revenue, so the challenge to their validity could not succeed. As no surviving issue remained on the legality of the notifications or any entitlement to continuance of full exemption, the writ petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436579