<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 605 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436579</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of notifications challenged by a company regarding Excise Duty exemption on cement products. The Court found the notifications to be clarificatory and in the public interest, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s argument based on the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition, concluding there was no further issue to address.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:05:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 605 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436579</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of notifications challenged by a company regarding Excise Duty exemption on cement products. The Court found the notifications to be clarificatory and in the public interest, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s argument based on the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition, concluding there was no further issue to address.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>