<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 91 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32447</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant incorrectly availed abatement for service tax as a &#039;Rent a Cab Operator&#039; but rectified the error promptly upon detection. While penalties under Sections 77 and 78 were initially imposed, the Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 78 but upheld the penalty under Section 77. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of accordingly, considering the unintentional nature of the error and timely corrective actions taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 91 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32447</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant incorrectly availed abatement for service tax as a &#039;Rent a Cab Operator&#039; but rectified the error promptly upon detection. While penalties under Sections 77 and 78 were initially imposed, the Tribunal set aside the penalty under Section 78 but upheld the penalty under Section 77. The appellant&#039;s appeal was disposed of accordingly, considering the unintentional nature of the error and timely corrective actions taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>