<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2304 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307473</link>
    <description>Service permanent establishment was found to exist in India because the secondee and service arrangement continued in substance, but royalty from intellectual property rights was not effectively connected with that establishment since the post-grant services did not create or make available the rights. Receipts from central cost recharges and structural tests were treated as fees for technical services under the treaty as ancillary and subsidiary to the licensed rights and involving make-available of services. Salary reimbursement relating to seconded employees was remanded for fresh verification and Indian attribution, with double taxation to be avoided. Interest under section 234B was held not leviable where the income had already been offered in return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 17:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2304 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307473</link>
      <description>Service permanent establishment was found to exist in India because the secondee and service arrangement continued in substance, but royalty from intellectual property rights was not effectively connected with that establishment since the post-grant services did not create or make available the rights. Receipts from central cost recharges and structural tests were treated as fees for technical services under the treaty as ancillary and subsidiary to the licensed rights and involving make-available of services. Salary reimbursement relating to seconded employees was remanded for fresh verification and Indian attribution, with double taxation to be avoided. Interest under section 234B was held not leviable where the income had already been offered in return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>