<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1711 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307472</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the case back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for re-evaluation based on the APA terms. The decision emphasized the importance of consistency in transfer pricing treatment and the potential application of APA terms to non-APA years, subject to transaction similarity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 17:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1711 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307472</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the case back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for re-evaluation based on the APA terms. The decision emphasized the importance of consistency in transfer pricing treatment and the potential application of APA terms to non-APA years, subject to transaction similarity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>