<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1552 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee concerning Transfer Pricing Adjustment. The Tribunal found merit in excluding certain companies from the final set of comparables, including Apar Chematek Lubricants Ltd., Info Edge (India) Ltd., MM TV Limited, and Media Research Users Council. With these exclusions, the Tribunal determined that the margins shown by the assessee were at arm&#039;s length with the mean margins of the remaining comparable companies, leading to a decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 17:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1552 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee concerning Transfer Pricing Adjustment. The Tribunal found merit in excluding certain companies from the final set of comparables, including Apar Chematek Lubricants Ltd., Info Edge (India) Ltd., MM TV Limited, and Media Research Users Council. With these exclusions, the Tribunal determined that the margins shown by the assessee were at arm&#039;s length with the mean margins of the remaining comparable companies, leading to a decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>