<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2305 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307474</link>
    <description>Where an Indian agent is remunerated at arm&#039;s length, no dependent agent PE is constituted on the facts described and no further profits are attributable in India from advertisement revenue; the attribution addition was deleted. Payments for programming rights and transponder facilities were not treated as taxable royalty on the relevant dates, so no tax was deductible at source under section 195 and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not stand; the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 17:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2305 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307474</link>
      <description>Where an Indian agent is remunerated at arm&#039;s length, no dependent agent PE is constituted on the facts described and no further profits are attributable in India from advertisement revenue; the attribution addition was deleted. Payments for programming rights and transponder facilities were not treated as taxable royalty on the relevant dates, so no tax was deductible at source under section 195 and disallowance under section 40(a)(i) could not stand; the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>