<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1628 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables and instructing the TPO to implement the working capital adjustment as directed by the DRP. The issue of the Most Appropriate Method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price was left open for adjudication in a future year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 17:07:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1628 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the exclusion of certain companies from the list of comparables and instructing the TPO to implement the working capital adjustment as directed by the DRP. The issue of the Most Appropriate Method for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price was left open for adjudication in a future year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>