<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32440</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court&#039;s order and directing in favor of the departmental civil appeal. The Court emphasized the applicability of surcharge in block assessments before 1.6.2002, aligning with previous interpretations of the law and clarifying the nature of the proviso to Section 113 as not retrospective but clarificatory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32440</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court&#039;s order and directing in favor of the departmental civil appeal. The Court emphasized the applicability of surcharge in block assessments before 1.6.2002, aligning with previous interpretations of the law and clarifying the nature of the proviso to Section 113 as not retrospective but clarificatory.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>