https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436523 The court held that the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution may not be entertained as the petitioner had already filed an appeal under Section 25 before the Appellate Authority, which is better suited to address the petitioner's contentions regarding the provisional attachment order. The court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy and directed parties to act on the server copy of the order downloaded from the court's official website. en-us Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:50:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436523 The court held that the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution may not be entertained as the petitioner had already filed an appeal under Section 25 before the Appellate Authority, which is better suited to address the petitioner's contentions regarding the provisional attachment order. The court emphasized the availability of an alternative remedy and directed parties to act on the server copy of the order downloaded from the court's official website. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436523