<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1434 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that in the absence of incriminating material found during the search, no additions could be made under Section 153A/143(3) and Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing precedents and emphasizing the need for incriminating material for additions in completed assessments. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the Rs. 1,77,72,706/- deemed dividend addition and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2023 00:17:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1434 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that in the absence of incriminating material found during the search, no additions could be made under Section 153A/143(3) and Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing precedents and emphasizing the need for incriminating material for additions in completed assessments. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the Rs. 1,77,72,706/- deemed dividend addition and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>