<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1627 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that additions cannot be made for an unabated assessment year in the absence of incriminating material found during a search operation. Relying on the principle favoring the assessee when interpreting taxing provisions and citing the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in CIT vs. Kabul Chawla, the Tribunal concluded that if assessment proceedings were completed before the search operation and no incriminating material was discovered, no addition can be made to the assessed income. The Tribunal distinguished conflicting judgments and deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2023 00:17:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1627 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that additions cannot be made for an unabated assessment year in the absence of incriminating material found during a search operation. Relying on the principle favoring the assessee when interpreting taxing provisions and citing the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision in CIT vs. Kabul Chawla, the Tribunal concluded that if assessment proceedings were completed before the search operation and no incriminating material was discovered, no addition can be made to the assessed income. The Tribunal distinguished conflicting judgments and deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>