<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 6 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32431</link>
    <description>The court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order, allowing the appellant to deposit Rs. 8.5 crores within six weeks, waiving the balance pre-deposit, and staying the recovery of the remaining amount until the appeal is decided. The Tribunal was directed to expedite the appeal&#039;s decision, and the court clarified that its observations should not influence the Tribunal&#039;s independent judgment on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 6 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32431</link>
      <description>The court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order, allowing the appellant to deposit Rs. 8.5 crores within six weeks, waiving the balance pre-deposit, and staying the recovery of the remaining amount until the appeal is decided. The Tribunal was directed to expedite the appeal&#039;s decision, and the court clarified that its observations should not influence the Tribunal&#039;s independent judgment on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>